The functional form of galaxy and halo luminosity and mass functions
Clicks: 2
ID: 321135
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #871 of 908 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 908 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The galaxy luminosity and stellar mass function (LF, SMF), and halo mass function (HMF), are fundamental quantities in astrophysics and crucial inputs to a range of astrophysical and cosmological analyses. They are typically parametrised by fitting functions that have been chosen ‘by eye’ to match observed or simulated data. We apply symbolic regression—specifically the Exhaustive Symbolic Regression (ESR) algorithm—to automate the search for optimal LF, SMF and HMF functional forms. ESR scores all functions up to a maximum complexity composed of a user-defined basis set of operators using the description length, an approximation to the Bayesian evidence that balances accuracy with complexity. We find many functions that outperform the Schechter and double Schechter functions for the LF and SMF, and that outperform all investigated literature functions (that outperform the Press–Schechter, Warren, Tinker, Sheth–Tormen and Jenkins) for the HMF. By additionally imposing ‘physicality checks’ on functions’ extrapolation and integration properties, we identify the optimal, low-complexity functional forms in terms of accuracy, simplicity and behaviour beyond the data range. As well as providing drop-in replacements for literature LF, SMF and HMF fitting functions, and identifying robust behaviour across well-fitting functions, we present a framework with which symbolic regression may be used to automate the discovery of optimal functions for any astrophysical dataset.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7168401984
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Amelia Ford, Harry Desmond, Deaglan J Bartlett, Pedro G Ferreira |
| Journal | monthly notices of the royal astronomical society |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/mnras/stag1333
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.