Cricothyroid Membrane Identification in a Female Model: Modified Laryngeal Handshake Versus Traditional Palpation

Clicks: 44
ID: 321105
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #46 of 97 articles by views in Military Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Cricothyrotomy is a critical intervention for airway obstruction on the battlefield. Accurate identification of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) is essential, yet prior literature indicates that CTM localization in female patients is more challenging due to anatomical differences. This study evaluated the accuracy of CTM identification in a female model by U.S. Army medics using the Modified Laryngeal Handshake (MLH) vs the Traditional Palpation Method (TM). Materials and Methods In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 29 active-duty, U.S. Army medics (military occupational specialty 68W) without additional advanced medical training were randomly assigned to use either the MLH (n = 14) or TM (n = 15) technique to identify the CTM on a standardized live female model. Success was defined as a mark within the cephalad and caudal borders of the CTM and within 5 mm of midline. Secondary outcomes included time to task completion, distance from CTM borders, horizontal deviation from midline, and participant confidence (measured via 10-cm visual analog scale). Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results There was no statistically significant difference in CTM identification success between the MLH (36%) and TM (33%) groups (P > .99). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences, including vertical and horizontal deviation, time to task completion (median MLH: 19.34 s vs TM: 12.97 s; P = .057), and confidence (median MLH: 7.0 vs TM: 8.0; P = .53). Conclusion U.S. Army medics demonstrated similarly low accuracy in CTM identification in a female model using both the MLH and TM techniques. These findings highlight the need for enhanced training protocols that consider sex-specific anatomical challenges to optimize cricothyrotomy success in prehospital battlefield settings.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168378970 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Antonio T Zavala, Cecil J Simmons, Brian J Ahern, Rodney X Sturdivant, Cheryl L Miller
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Military Medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usag322
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usag322
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.