Growth patterns and climate sensitivity differ for understory and canopy trees
Clicks: 10
ID: 320378
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
10 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #35 of 77 articles by views in Tree physiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract While vertical forest structure is known to influence microclimatic conditions and tree growth, detailed knowledge of differences in seasonal growth dynamics between understory and canopy trees, especially at fine temporal scales, is still lacking. In this study, we compared growth dynamics of five temperate tree species (Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Acer campestre, Ulmus laevis) based on sub-daily measurements from automatic band and pivotal dendrometers across four old-growth forests. Hourly growth probabilities were modelled using Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) in relation to climatic conditions and day phases. Understory trees exhibited shorter growing seasons, accumulated fewer growing hours, and displayed a less distinct diel growth rhythm than canopy trees. Nonetheless, when growth occurred, their growth rate per growing hour, normalized by stem diameter (DBH), was higher. However, overall growth remained constrained, likely because light availability limited the frequency or duration of such favourable periods, preventing consistent utilization of the buffered microclimatic conditions typical of the forest understory. GLMMs successfully captured growth dynamics in canopy trees but performed poorly for understory trees, indicating lower dependency of their growth patterns on climatic conditions. Overall, our results show that understory tree growth is constrained primarily by limited light availability rather than by atmospheric conditions, leading to fewer growth periods that account for a larger proportion of the annual increment compared to canopy trees.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167845638
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jakub Kašpar, Jan Krejza, Jan Holík, David Janík, Růžena Janoutová, Kamil Král |
| Journal | Tree physiology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/treephys/tpag093
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.