Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry for Rapid Toxicology Targeted Screening of Emergency Department Samples: A Research Study

Clicks: 31
ID: 320360
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #34 of 68 articles by views in journal of analytical toxicology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Acute recreational drug toxicity (ARDT) is a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) presentations, yet comprehensive toxicological testing by chromatographic techniques is rarely conducted due to limited availability and resource-intensive workflows. Consequently, initial clinical decisions are made without analytical confirmation. Paper spray-mass spectrometry (PS-MS) may offer an alternative approach for targeted clinical toxicology screening owing to its rapid and simplified analysis of biological samples. Serum donor samples from patients presenting to the ED with suspected ARDT were analysed using PS-MS and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for method comparison. Targeted screening and quantitative performance were evaluated using pooled diagnostic metrics, orthogonal regression, per-analyte % bias and Bland-Altman analyses. PS-MS was subsequently applied to a larger screening-only cohort to assess analytical performance, detection frequency, and concentration distributions across a clinically relevant drug panel. Across 114 research samples, PS-MS demonstrated high targeted screening performance, with a pooled sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity and positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 98.2%. Quantitative comparison showed strong correlation between methods, with proportional bias at higher concentrations and no single analyte influencing the agreement metrics. In the screening-only cohort (n = 99), PS-MS detected and quantified a broad range of analytes, including evidence of polydrug use. Several low-frequency analytes were not observed within the analysed serum donor sample cohort. PS-MS may provide a fast and specific targeted screening approach for ARDT in ED samples, delivering analytically informative toxicological data. While not a replacement for confirmatory testing or a validated in vitro diagnostic assay, this research study into PS-MS represents a valuable complementary tool to support downstream confirmatory testing.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167820992 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Stefania Boccuzzi, David Cowan, Paul I Dargan, Edward Goucher, Vincenzo Abbate
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of analytical toxicology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jat/bkag060
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkag060
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.