The European Association for Neuro-oncology (EANO) Consensus Statement on Radiation Necrosis

Clicks: 2
ID: 320356
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #74 of 125 articles by views in journal of neuro-oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 125 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Radiation necrosis (RN) complicates neuro-oncological care, mimicking tumor recurrence and lacking high-level evidence for standardized management. METHODS: A European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) expert panel utilized a three-round Delphi process to create a comprehensive expert opinion document based on the available current scientific evidence. A series of statements, derived from the published literature were created by the experts in each field. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: After three rounds among 20 experts that included adaptation of statements, the Delphi process reached a consensus (≥80% agreement) on 53 statements out of 57. RN occurs in 4% to 30% of patients, typically appearing 6 to 24 months after radiotherapy for primary (glial) or metastatic brain tumors. Experts identified perfusion MRI and amino acid PET as the most suitable imaging modalities for differentiation from tumor recurrence. While histopathology remains the gold standard, identifying viable tumor cells in irradiated gliomas is challenging due to overlapping cytological features with reactive glia. For symptomatic management, corticosteroids may be tried, and bevacizumab is recommended for corticosteroid-refractory cases, with evidence suggesting profound efficacy even at low doses. Surgery is considered effective for rapid symptom relief and definitive diagnosis in accessible lesions. Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) can be considered an additional treatment option for symptomatic RN. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of Level 1 evidence, these Delphi-survey-formulated recommendations provide actionable guidance for clinical practice. There is a need for prospective randomized trials focusing on symptomatic RN.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167850986 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Johnny Duerinck, van den Bent Mj, Petter Brandal, G Minniti, Norbert Galldiks, Enrico Franceschi, M A W Geurts, Anna S Berghoff, Mirjam Renovanz, Dieta Brandsma, Tom J. Snijders, Michael Weller, Susan Short, Michael Platten, Emilie Le Rhun, Matthias Preusser, Leonille Schweizer, Nathalie L. Albert, Julia Furtner, E. Razis
Journal journal of neuro-oncology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noag153
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.