Beyond Disease Management: The Fitness-for-Duty Arbitration Function of an Embedded Military Cardiology Service

Clicks: 1
ID: 320241
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #71 of 72 articles by views in Military Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Military health care relies on coordination between primary care and specialist hospital medicine. This study assessed the decision-making contribution of an embedded military cardiology service to the cardiovascular care and fitness evaluation of service members. Materials and Methods Retrospective observational study including all active duty and reserve service members referred for a first cardiology assessment between 1 January and 31 December 2022. Collected data included referral reasons, demographic characteristics, care pathway, timelines, and any recourse to civilian care. Results A total of 115 patients were analyzed (mean age 39.6 years; 89.5% male). The main referral reasons were clinical symptoms (33.0%), asymptomatic electrocardiographic abnormality (25.2%), and cardiovascular risk assessment (23.5%). Beyond the medical referral reason, 28% of referrals explicitly requested a fitness opinion only, with no diagnostic or therapeutic objective stated. No cardiovascular disease was ultimately identified in 56.5% of patients. Care was delivered exclusively within the military system for 84.3% of patients. The median time from referral request to fitness-for-duty classification was 70 days, reduced to 7 days when an operational constraint was reported, but reaching 232 days when referral to a civilian facility for specialist care was required. Conclusions Military cardiology activity is primarily driven by screening and fitness arbitration rather than disease management. An integrated pathway supports operationally aligned decision-making, with markedly shorter timelines when urgency is flagged.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167824569 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Raphaël Demoulin, Marie Agius, Louis Marotte, Paul Schmitt, Alisson Adet, Frédéric Pons, E. Capilla, G. Rohel, Thibaut Prevautel, G Cellarier
Journal Military Medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usag324
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.