Can tidal disruption event models reliably measure black hole masses?

Clicks: 1
ID: 319947
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #745 of 892 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 892 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Tidal disruption event (TDE) light curves are increasingly used to infer the masses of quiescent supermassive black holes (MBH), offering a powerful probe of low-mass black hole demographics independent of host-galaxy scaling relations. However, most semi-analytic TDE models invoke assumptions aligned with a full stellar disruption, despite theoretical expectations that partial disruptions dominate the TDE population. In this work we test the robustness of current TDE models using three repeating partial TDEs (rpTDEs), in which the multiple flares produced by the same surviving stellar core must yield consistent black hole masses. We present spectroscopic observations establishing AT 2023adr as a rpTDE, making it the third such spectroscopically confirmed event. We independently model the flares of the three rpTDEs; 2020vdq, 2022dbl, and 2023adr, applying fallback-accretion fits, stream–stream collision scaling relations, luminosity-based empirical relations, accretion disc models, and cooling-envelope fits. After accounting for statistical and model-specific systematics, we find that all TDE models generally return self-consistent MBH values between flares, and are broadly consistent with host-galaxy MBH proxies, recovering MBH to within 0.3–0.5 dex. However, the convergence of fallback models towards unphysical stellar masses and impact parameters reveals limitations in existing fallback model grids. We also show that light curve coverage, particularly in the near-ultraviolet, is critical for constraining model parameters. This has direct implications for interpreting the thousands of TDE light curves expected from upcoming surveys such as the Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time, where from MOSFiT simulations, we find that MBH may be underestimated on average by 0.1 – 0.5 dex depending on peak light curve coverage and the availability of follow-up data.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167667374 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors C R Angus, A J Smith, D.T. Magill, P Ramsden, N Sarin, M. Nicholl, B Mockler, Erica Hammerstein, R Stein, Y Yao, T de Boer, K C Chambers, M E Huber, Chien-Cheng Lin, T B Lowe, E A Magnier, S. J. Smartt, R J Wainscoat
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1285
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag1285
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.