Reporting follow-up budgets for diagnostic and predictive AI
Clicks: 39
ID: 319888
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
11.4
/100
39 views
16 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #45 of 77 articles by views in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To argue that diagnostic and predictive AI should be evaluated by both classification performance and the downstream work their outputs create. DISCUSSION: Prior work has framed AI as an intervention and has quantified alert burden or decision utility under resource constraints. This perspective extends that logic beyond surveillance alerts by proposing follow-up budget reporting for diagnostic and predictive AI. Across lung nodule detection, sepsis alerting, and autonomous diabetic retinopathy screening, similar classification performance can imply very different demands on imaging, specialist access, nursing attention, and patient waiting. A follow-up budget statement should specify the comparator, scope and stopping rule, downstream action volume, resource types consumed, yield per clinically meaningful true-positive case, and the local pathway assumptions and stakeholders responsible for those estimates. CONCLUSION: Clinical AI evaluation should make follow-up capacity visible alongside discrimination, calibration, and decision-analytic measures.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167716751
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Henry Bair, Mak Djulbegovic |
| Journal | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jamia/ocag118
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.