Theism and (Im)Plausible Causal Principles
Clicks: 19
ID: 319828
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
5.4
/100
19 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #19 of 48 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Contingency arguments purport to derive the existence of a necessary concrete being from the fact that there’s contingency. Noël Blas Saenz has raised an interesting objection to a causal principle at play in a recent contingency argument. Here, I show that Saenz’s objection has a limited scope since it depends on a contentious metaphysical assumption.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167508728
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Perry Hendricks |
| Journal | journal of pharmaceutical analysis |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/analys/anag055
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.