Pivotal Clinical Trials in C3 Glomerulopathy: answers and remaining uncertainties
Clicks: 3
ID: 319530
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #81 of 100 articles by views in nephrology dialysis transplantation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and primary immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) are ultra-rare glomerular diseases driven by dysregulation of the complement system, most commonly involving the alternative pathway. Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis have enabled the development of targeted complement therapies. The publication of pivotal phase 3 trials evaluating proximal complement inhibitors -iptacopan, a selective factor B inhibitor, and pegcetacoplan, a C3 inhibitor- marks a turning point in the management of C3G and IC-MPGN. Both agents demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in proteinuria and stabilization of kidney function, establishing proof of efficacy. Despite these advances, important uncertainties remain. Key unresolved issues include optimal patient selection, timing and duration of therapy, treatment sequencing, monitoring strategies, and long-term kidney outcomes. Conventional immunosuppressive approaches provide inconsistent benefit and do not directly address complement dysregulation, while validated biomarkers to guide complement blockade are lacking. Additional challenges relate to treatment discontinuation, management of special populations, and health-system implementation. This review critically appraises the evidence from recent pivotal trials, highlighting both their transformative impact and the questions they raise. We emphasize the need for long-term outcome studies, precision-based therapeutic strategies, and pragmatic real-world data. Ultimately, the challenge ahead is not whether complement inhibition is effective but how best to deploy these therapies to maximize durable benefit, minimize risk, and ensure equitable access.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167222438
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernando Caravaca‐Fontán, Annette Bruchfeld, Sarah Moran, Stefanie Steiger, Kate Stevens, Y K Onno Teng, Eleni Frangou, Şafak Mirioğlu, Luís F. Quintana, Andreas Kronbichler |
| Journal | nephrology dialysis transplantation |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ndt/gfag155
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.