The Contribution of Social and Economic Factors to Accelerated Biological Aging Differences Between Non-Hispanic Black and White Adults in the Health and Retirement Study
Clicks: 3
ID: 319513
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #125 of 134 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 134 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Biological aging predicts health outcomes beyond chronological age. The relative contribution of social, economic, and health factors to biological aging differences between Black and White adults remains unclear. Methods In a cross-sectional analysis of 2,086 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years from the 2016 Health and Retirement Study (1,757 non-Hispanic White; 329 non-Hispanic Black), biological age was measured using DNA methylation–based GrimAge. Accelerated aging was defined as having a biological age older than expected for one’s chronological age. We used logistic regression to assess the impact of race on accelerated aging and decomposition analysis to determine factors explaining differences in accelerated aging between Black and White participants. Covariate blocks were: age, education, wealth, social frailty assessed using a composite index measuring social connections, financial autonomy, neighborhood environment, volunteering and employment engagement, behavioral factors (physical activity, alcohol use, sleep disorder, body mass index); medical conditions; and physical disability. Results Black participants had higher accelerated aging than White participants (57.1% vs 41.8%; standardized mean difference, 0.3). In the staged decomposition of the biological aging gap, age and education explained 21.1% of the difference. The cumulative explained share rose to 51.8% with wealth, 77.6% with social frailty, 80.3% with health behaviors, 90.5% with medical conditions, and 91.6% with physical disability. In multivariable logistic regression adjusting for all domains, the racial difference was no longer significant. Conclusions Social and economic factors largely explained accelerated biological aging differences between non-Hispanic Black and White adults. These findings identify policy-relevant targets to improve healthy aging.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167078742
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ashraf Abugroun, Torsten B. Neilands, Jennifer Livaudais‐Toman, Julene K. Johnson, Leah Karliner, Margaret C. Fang |
| Journal | the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/gerona/glag169
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.