Forward and Inverse Mantle Convection with Neural Operators

Clicks: 1
ID: 319361
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #207 of 220 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 220 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Summary Thermal state reconstruction—reversing convection to recover the thermal structure of the mantle at an earlier geologic time—is an important tool to understand the evolution of mantle convection and its relation to seismic tomographic images and observations at the surface. Thermal state reconstructions are computationally expensive. Here we transformed the basic computational element, numerical solvers, into neural operators, a class of machine learning models for learning mappings between function spaces. Focusing on a specific architecture, Fourier Neural Operators, we demonstrate that they can represent not only a surrogate model like the Stokes system of equations using a purely physics informed approach, but also discover operators without explicit mathematical formulations or even ill-posedness from data, including the direct mapping between two convecting thermal states separated by a long time interval much larger than the Courant Fredrich Lewy condition and its reversal. These neural operators significantly accelerate forward and inverse convection modeling by transforming forward physical processes into surrogate models with lower complexity while utilizing auto-differentiation to calculate gradients. With this framework, we demonstrate the strength and weaknesses of four methods for thermal state reconstructions: Reverse buoyancy, reverse convection operator, an inversion with only the terminal thermal state, and a joint inversion with the terminal thermal state and surface velocity evolution. The reverse convection operator is shown to perform poorly in the presence of observational noise, but the joint inversion overcomes this limitation. The joint technique could probably become a solution to large-scale thermal state inversion problems using seismic tomography and plate tectonic reconstructions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7166820715 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Chenxi Kong, Michael Gurnis, Zachary E. Ross
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag255
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag255
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.