Older parent–adult child contact and proximity across Europe: New evidence, digital communication, and measurement issues
Clicks: 1
ID: 319140
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #76 of 88 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aim to provide updated, comparative evidence on the prevalence of frequent (face-to-face, telephone, and digital) contact and close proximity between older parents and their children, and to assess how measurement choices affect cross-national patterns in Europe. METHODS: We use data on 23 European countries from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe wave 9 (2021-2022) and the European Social Survey round 10 (2020-2022) to estimate the prevalence of frequent contact and close proximity across different approaches: most-contacted versus random child, any versus mode-specific contact, distance versus travel-time thresholds. Cross-national coherence in country rankings is assessed with Spearman rank correlations. RESULTS: We find a pronounced regional gradient from Southern Europe, with the highest levels of any-mode and face-to-face frequent contact and close proximity, to Nordic and several Continental countries, with the lowest. Eastern Europe lies in-between, with high internal heterogeneity. Instead, digital contact does not follow a clear geographic pattern. Face-to-face and phone contact remain widespread, whereas text and especially video contact are less common. Measurement choices substantially shift prevalence levels, and although country orderings are often similar, concordance is weak for proximity measures based on spatial distance and travel time. DISCUSSION: We document persistent family-regime differences and interpret digital contact as a supplementary channel of associational solidarity that does not reflect the traditional North/South gradient. We also show that survey design choices matter not only for levels but sometimes also for cross-national orderings.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7166531514
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruno Arpino, Marco Tosi, Valeria Bordone |
| Journal | the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/geronb/gbag117
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.