Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of an Intervention to Reduce Infant Bathing

Clicks: 2
ID: 318949
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #297 of 304 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 304 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bathing, even in tap water, alters skin physiology. Frequent infant bathing may increase the risk of eczema developing. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a randomised controlled feasibility trial of an intervention to reduce infant bathing frequency and intensity. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial. 105 pregnant women (≥ 16 years) with family history of atopy, carrying a healthy singleton child (54 male, 51 female) were randomised in a 1:1 ratio during pregnancy, or postnatally prior to the first infant bath. The intervention group were asked to reduce bathing frequency (no more than once a week for the first six months of age) and intensity (keep baths short, not too hot and washing in plain water is usually sufficient). The control group received the routine postnatal infant care advice offered in their maternity unit.The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of eligible families willing to be randomised to the intervention. The secondary clinical outcome was a blinded assessment of infant eczema at age 6 months, using an adaptation of the UK Working Party Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. RESULTS: : 261 pregnant women were screened, of whom 21 were ineligible and 105/240 (44%) were randomised to the intervention (52) and control (53) groups. Adherence to the intervention was high with 79.6% (35/44) in the intervention arm bathing their infant once a week or less, compared to 28.6% (14/49) in the control group. In the intervention group 95% (38/40) agreed or strongly agreed that the intervention was acceptable. There was minimal contamination of the control group (1/46). Follow-up was high with 89% (93/105) of families completing the final 6-month questionnaire and 82% (86/105) attended the final visit. Eczema outcomes occurred less frequently in the intervention arm compared to the control arm: visible eczema 15.8% (6/38) vs 29.2% (14/48); parent reported eczema 9.1% (4/44) vs 12.2% (6/49); and doctor diagnosed parent reported eczema 6.8% (3/44) vs 10.2% (5/49). No noteworthy adverse effects of the intervention were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the feasibility of randomising infants during pregnancy to a reduced frequency and intensity bathing intervention for eczema prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN51491794 (Registered 24/07/2023).
Reference Key
openalex_W7166112444 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Michael R. Perkin, Michael Ussher, Lucy Goldsmith, Carsten Flohr, Amanda Roberts, Victoria Cornelius, Charlotte Wahlich, Kathryn Willis, Umar A R Chaudhry, Selma Audi, Robert J Boyle
Journal the british journal of dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag248
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljag248
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.