Patient-led, home-based follow-up for colorectal cancer: the DISTANCE multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial
Clicks: 7
ID: 318872
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising, consequentially traditional follow-up care models are increasingly unsustainable. Patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) may offer a promising alternative to reduce hospital visits while maintaining patient well-being. METHODS: The DISTANCE trial is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 354 stage I-III CRC survivors, disease-free at 12 months post-surgery, assigned to either PHFU or standard follow-up. The primary endpoint was the number of hospital contacts. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QoL, EORTC QLQ-C30), cancer-related worry (CWS), and psychological distress (HADS). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, no significant difference in hospital contacts was observed. In the as-treated (AT) analysis, PHFU reduced hospital contacts by 38% compared to standard follow-up (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75, p < 0.001). There was substantial crossover, with 117 patients assigned to PHFU receiving standard follow-up and 10 patients assigned to standard follow-up receiving PHFU. No significant differences were found in QoL or psychological distress between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The DISTANCE trial suggests that PHFU is a feasible and effective alternative to standard hospital-based follow-up for CRC survivors.TOC Summary.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7166181646
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | M H Elise van Driel, Hidde Swartjes, Jobbe Lemmens, Seyed M. Qaderi, Steven Teerenstra, J H Custers, Mg Elferink, Bob J. van Wely, J G Bloemen, Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein, Peter van Duijvendijk, Emiel G G Verdaasdonk, Marnix A J de Roos, Veerle M H Coupé, Geraldine R. Vink, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J. Grünhagen, Johannes H.W. de Wilt |
| Journal | the british journal of surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjs/znag081
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.