The Diffusion of Legal Innovations

Clicks: 1
ID: 318834
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,421 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The diffusion of legal innovations (understood as disseminating new practices regarding the law) remains an intriguing phenomenon. Despite growing attention, there is still no integrated framework to represent how some legal innovations experience wide adoption while others fail. This chapter aims to provide the state of the art about the diffusion of legal innovation. It presents existing knowledge about the diffusion of legal innovation by relying on the theories of innovation diffusion and translates them to the field of legal innovation. In doing so, the author pays specific attention to two features: the paradox of diffusion and the turbulent journey proposition. The paradox of diffusion is that unlike technological innovations, legal innovations prove hard to protect. However, the chapter shows that firms may have an interest in diffusing weakly appropriable innovations under three cases: when the collective adoption of innovation is favorable to the firm itself, in the presence of increasing returns, or when costly-to-imitate resources exist. The turbulent journey proposition refers to the fact that previous studies have overlooked that the innovation journey is not linear. Legal innovation success relies not only on initial conditions but also on alliances, discursive strategies, and events that occur throughout the process. As a consequence, a slightly different picture of legal innovation emerges. Finally, the chapter discusses the practical implications of the presented model.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165884119 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Marc Fréchet
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0017
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.