seqLens: optimizing language models for genomic predictions

Clicks: 3
ID: 318820
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #184 of 245 articles by views in molecular biology and evolution

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 245 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Understanding evolutionary variation in genomic sequences through the lens of language modeling has the potential to revolutionize biological research. Yet to maximize the utility of language modeling in genomics, we must overcome computational challenges in tokenization and model architecture adapted to diverse genomic features across evolutionary timescales. In this study, we investigated key elements in genomic language modeling (gLM), including tokenization, pretraining datasets, fine-tuning approaches, pooling methods, and domain adaptation, and applied the language models to diverse genomic data. We gathered two evolutionarily distinct pretraining datasets: one consisting of 19,551 reference genomes, including over 18,000 prokaryotic genomes (115B nucleotides) and the remainder eukaryotic genomes, and another more balanced dataset with 1,354 genomes, including 1,166 prokaryotic and 188 eukaryotic reference genomes (180B nucleotides). We trained five byte-pair encoding tokenizers and pretrained 52 gLMs, systematically comparing di↵erent architectures, hyperparameters, and classification heads. We introduce seqLens, a family of models based on disentangled attention with relative positional encoding, which outperforms relatively similar-sized models in 13 of 19 benchmarking phenotypic predictions. We further explore continual pretraining, domain adaptation, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods to assess trade-o↵s between computational efficiency and accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that relevant pretraining data significantly boost performance, alternative pooling techniques can enhance classification, tokenizers with larger vocabulary sizes negatively impact generalization, and gLMs are capable of understanding evolutionary relationships. These insights provide a foundation for optimizing genomic language models for identifying diverse evolutionary genomic features and improving genome annotations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165966877 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mahdi Baghbanzadeh, B Mann, Keith A. Crandall, Ali Rahnavard
Journal molecular biology and evolution
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/molbev/msag139
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.