Third-Party Funding of Litigation
Clicks: 1
ID: 318811
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,441 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines the strategic benefits that companies can gain by integrating third-party litigation funding into their legal strategy. It also emphasizes the importance of a careful integration of the funding mechanism to ensure its effectiveness as a strategic tool. Third-party litigation funding allows individuals or companies to have their litigation expenses covered by third-party investors in return for a share of the final awarded compensation. This practice attracts an increasing number of investors as well as companies seeking to be financed. The main benefit to this practice is its ability to help companies mitigate the ever-rising costs associated with adversarial legal proceedings, a long-standing problem that would otherwise deter them from seeking justice. Companies would benefit significantly from incorporating this third-party litigation funding practice into their legal strategy not only to defend themselves in the courtroom, but also to enhance their financial positions. Indeed, boosting litigation funding tangibly strengthens companies’ negotiating power, thereby increasing their chances of receiving a favorable judicial outcome. For the successful integration of this practice into a company’s legal strategy, a thorough understanding of the legal implications and potential risks is required. Failure to exercise caution might lead companies to face issues such as conflicts of interest, or to risk engaging in frivolous litigation. This leads to the chapter’s conclusion that the recent implementation of regulatory frameworks by legislators within this emerging legal practice is a very positive development, allowing companies to leverage the benefits of third-party litigation funding while also minimizing serious financial risks.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165893341
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jean-Pierre Blin, Etienne Poeuf |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0045
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.