Regulatory and Institutional Entrepreneurship
Clicks: 3
ID: 318791
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,448 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The concept of regulatory entrepreneurship was coined by Pollman and Barry to characterize the business strategies that change existing regulatory frameworks to increase future opportunities or maintain current business activities. The rapid expansion of this stream of literature not only echoes the copious news items concerning lobbying operations, but also the rise of platform business models operating in legal grey areas and whose influence strategies are still controversial. From this perspective, scholars from both law and business management backgrounds have endeavored to describe the different strategies deployed by regulatory entrepreneurs, their implementation process as well as the institutional conditions favoring their emergence. In this chapter, as a response, the author offers a cross-literature review of these concepts of regulatory entrepreneurship and institutional entrepreneurship. This systemic review on institutional entrepreneurship unpacks its main conceptual properties in comparison with regulatory entrepreneurship, and presents four areas of cross-fertilization: understanding agency, power dynamics, hybridization processes, and the complexity of institutional change. The chapter also argues that future research should further explore the dynamic interaction between different strategies promoted by institutional entrepreneurs, considering that regulatory entrepreneurship appears as embedded in a wider complex network of institutional initiatives. Accordingly, this chapter offers a research agenda to build upon the complementarities of those literatures.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165843632
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Amélie Gabriagues |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.