A Review of Legal Design Methods

Clicks: 3
ID: 318785
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,398 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter explores legal design methods used in legal design research, education, and practice, drawing on a comprehensive review of literature that spans 20 years. The objectives are highly practical, aiming to elucidate the legal design methods employed, their placement within the legal design process, the rationale behind their selection, and experience in implementing them in a legal design sprint. Through a rigorous review of existing scholarship, the authors investigate the selection criteria for various legal design methods, their strategic implementation within the legal design process, and their practical effectiveness. The study incorporates empirical insights gained from implementing these methods in a legal design sprint environment, providing concrete examples of their application and outcomes. The analysis emphasizes the human-centered approach to legal problem-solving, examining how design methodologies can bridge the gap between traditional legal frameworks and user-centric solutions. This research contributes to the growing discourse on the intersection of legal practice and design thinking, offering practitioners, educators, and researchers a structured framework for understanding and implementing legal design methods. It offers valuable insights to those seeking to navigate the dynamic intersection of law and design in a human-centered manner.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165968094 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sunghoon Chung, Jieun Kim
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0016
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0016
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.