Corporate Fraud Examination

Clicks: 2
ID: 318776
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #852 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter discusses characteristics of knowledge work, knowledge uncertainty perspectives, knowledge co-creation with clients, knowledge depth and breadth, practice-driven law firm change, legal knowledge and analytical technologies, professional network identification, and some law firm characteristics of particular importance to knowledge management. The issue of legal information and knowledge management is not only considered from the perspective of law firms. Legal departments of companies and, more generally, the flow of legal information from legal departments to nonlawyers such as executives and operational staff, are also covered in the chapter. The question of legal information is put into perspective with the notion of legal performance by explaining how mastering legal knowledge management can improve the legal performance of companies, a notion that is at the center of this book’s approach. Knowledge co-creation with clients is based on the notion that the client and the lawyer have different knowledge domains. The client–lawyer knowledge gap can be bridged by co-creating knowledge directed at solving or enabling knowledge issues. In the role of defender, the lawyer is to assess the legal implications of the alleged wrongdoing by the client. In the role of enabler, the lawyer is to assess possibilities for the client. In the role of investigator, the lawyer is to reconstruct past events and sequences of events. In the various roles, knowledge-sharing and co-creation can enable successful outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165937424 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Petter Gottschalk, Christopher Hamerton
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0048
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197769034.013.0048
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.