P18 Facial dermis has distinct extracellular matrix influencing biomechanical tissue properties and cell behaviours

Clicks: 1
ID: 318393
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #265 of 304 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 304 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction and aims Skin of the face is indisputably different from other regions of the body; for example, it is highly innervated and vascularized, and anecdotally superior at repair/regeneration. We propose that positionally distinct dermal features reflect the developmental origins of the tissue, with facial dermis uniquely derived from neural crest, and not mesoderm as in the rest of the body. We previously reported bulk tissue RNA sequencing indicating that cheek dermis differences include a distinct extracellular matrix (ECM), but the functional implications are not known. Methods Bioinformatic analyses of diverse transcriptomic data representing face vs. body dermis/fibroblasts provided insight about functions and regulatory mechanisms. The effect of the anatomically variable ECM on tissue biomechanics was tested by enzymatic digestion and nanoindentation. Primary cell/tissue culture and in vivo experiments link the variable ECM with distinct cell behaviours. Results RNA sequencing analysis of mouse and human dermis and dermal fibroblasts from face and body sites discovered remarkably consistent site-specific signatures. Functional classification of the differentially expressed genes revealed the ECM to be significantly altered. The functional consequences were demonstrated by susceptibility to collagenase digestion: cheek dermis was rapidly degraded relative to back/abdomen implying fragility/softness. Nanoindentation validated that cheek dermis is less stiff. Culture of freshly isolated primary mouse fibroblasts (cheek vs. back) on soft (2kPa) vs. stiff (32kPa) substrates uncovered divergent mechanoresponses, including many transcriptional differences with potential to influence wound/scar outcomes. Implications of the ECM differences on cell migration were detected during explant cultures; fibroblast emigration was significantly more consistent and faster in cheek vs. back dermis. Similarly, histological analysis of tissue repopulation during wound healing showed faster migration of cheek fibroblasts out of wound-edge dermis into the wound bed. Conclusions This work builds upon recognized anatomical and developmental variations in skin and highlights the ECM as a key influential variable.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165671335 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Claire Piper, Claudia Clara, Willow Hight-Warburton, Karen Liu, Anthony Graham, Tanya Shaw
Journal the british journal of dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag151.058
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.