Comment on ‘Ethnicity and the epidemiology of skin cancer incidence: a national retrospective population-based study in England, 2013–20’
Clicks: 1
ID: 318240
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #219 of 304 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 304 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This correspondence comments on a recent national study of skin cancer incidence by ethnicity in England and argues that broad English ethnicity categories should not be directly used as proxies for native Asian populations. We highlight that melanoma subtype structure, nonmelanoma skin cancer patterns, healthcare context and diagnostic pathways differ across Asian settings, particularly in China, which limits direct extrapolation. This letter aims to encourage more context-specific interpretation of ethnicity-based epidemiological findings.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165553871
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Guofu Mao, Haizhen Lan |
| Journal | the british journal of dermatology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjd/ljag168
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.