‘Allegory’ and ‘Literality’ in Flux

Clicks: 1
ID: 318149
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,348 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In Christian commentary from the late Middle Ages to the early modern era, conventional categories of the ‘literal’ and ‘allegorical’ senses of Scripture—and their customary alignments with Jewish and Christian interpretation—undergo dramatic change. During this period, a range of Christian interpreters gradually broaden and widely privilege the category of the ‘literal sense’, incorporating within that sense meanings once regarded as ‘allegorical’. But during the same period, Christian commentators recurrently denounce conspicuous departures from the scriptural ‘letter’ in the Talmudic and midrashic lore of the Jews. As forms of Jewish commentary come to be extensively associated with interpretive divergence, traditional affiliations of ‘allegorical’ ways of reading with Christians and ‘literalistic’ ones with Jews are increasingly altered. The critical turnabout involved in these shifting perspectives has volatile consequences—intellectual, religious, and social—in medieval and early modern civilization, and the interpretive controversies finally promote far-reaching reassessments of figuration at large
Reference Key
openalex_W7165540156 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jon Whitman
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192894359.013.0008
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.