The Uncommonness of the Common Core

Clicks: 1
ID: 318142
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,338 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines the debate surrounding the common core thesis of mystical experience by situating contemporary empirical psychology within the longer intellectual history of psychology, philosophy, and theology. It traces how William James and Walter Stace defend the distinction between experience and interpretation, establishing a foundation for a cross-cultural, phenomenological, and psychometric study of mysticism, while critics such as McGinn and Wulff question the adequacy of measurement approaches. The chapter addresses how psychology’s embrace of positivist empiricism narrows its scope and excludes transcendent phenomena, contrasting this reductionism with historical and philosophical perspectives that affirm the ontological and epistemological significance of mystical experience. It also explores typologies of mysticism, exemplified in Stace’s introvertive and extrovertive categories, and illustrates the common core thesis through historical figures such as Teresa of Avila, whose writings highlight the tension between lived experience and theological interpretation. Finally, the chapter argues for methodological pluralism that integrates empirical, philosophical, and theological approaches, advancing a truly psychological psychology capable of investigating transcendent experience without reducing it to pathology or mere cultural construction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165538541 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ralph W. Hood, Malynda Clark
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192844064.013.2
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.