Introduction
Clicks: 2
ID: 317946
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #822 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter introduces the volume by setting out its purpose and scope and explaining two key operational concepts—multidomain operations and large-scale combat operations—that underpin many of the discussions that follow. It outlines the strategic and legal ambiguities that run throughout the volume, including unresolved issues arising within specific domains of warfare, uncertainties surrounding regional alliance structures, and critical questions concerning the legal status of Taiwan. The chapter then turns to the themes of legal statecraft and interpretive choice, examining how law not only constrains State action but also enables it by offering States a degree of latitude in how legal norms are interpreted and applied. It highlights the importance of the cognitive domain—particularly the legal narratives constructed around compliance with the law of armed conflict—and considers whether we may be entering another “Solferino moment,” in which public expectations about the conduct of war shift significantly in response to new forms of scrutiny and visibility. The chapter concludes by outlining the book’s structure and offering reflections on its overarching aim: to support the development of strategic legal thinking about how international law, and the law of armed conflict in particular, may apply in any future conflict in the Indo-Pacific.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165113434
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Douglas Guilfoyle, Jennifer Maddocks |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oso/9780197844540.003.0001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.