Validation of a Remote Monitoring Blood Pressure Device in a General Population Cohort
Clicks: 3
ID: 317937
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #54 of 62 articles by views in American Journal of Hypertension
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring has emerged as a promising solution to overcome barriers to hypertension care access, yet validation of devices is lacking. Methods We conducted the validation of the Ideal Life BP Manager™ BP device, a remote BP monitoring device, using the AAMI/ESH/ISO protocol. From June 2021 to May 2022, participants were screened and systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measurements were conducted by trained staff using the Ideal Life BP Manager™ and a mercury sphygmomanometer. Statistical analyses were performed to assess agreement of SBP and DBP. Results Of the 90 individuals screened, 79 were included, with a mean age of 50.9 years (standard deviation (SD) 15.6) and the majority being female (68.8%). The mean ± SD differences between the Ideal Life BP Manager™ and mercury sphygmomanometer measurements were 2.20 ± 7.37 mmHg for SBP and 1.49 ± 7.31 mmHg for DBP, satisfying AAMI/ESH/ISO protocol criterion 1. Criterion 2 was also met, with participant-level standard deviations of the mean paired differences (6.54 mmHg for SBP, 6.30 mmHg for DBP) falling below the protocol-specified thresholds. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated limits of agreement of –12.0 to 16.9 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and –12.8 to 15.9 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion The Ideal Life BP Manager™ met the AAMI/ESH/ISO validation criteria.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165358338
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew M Moore, Ayamo Oben, Paul Muntner, Stacy Harris, Nancy Saxon, Eric (Trombonist) Wallace, Suzanne Oparil, Alan Tita, Rachel R Sinkey |
| Journal | American Journal of Hypertension |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ajh/hpag042
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.