Article 36—Interpretation and Correction of the Award

Clicks: 1
ID: 317902
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,306 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines Article 36 of the ICDR Rules. As with most other arbitral rules, the ICDR Rules provide a limited opportunity for interpretation or correction of an award and for an additional award to be made on claims presented, but not included within the award. Article 36 provides a strict deadline for any such interpretations, corrections, or additional awards. The rationale behind such a limited review and on such a strict timeline is the concern not to interfere with the parties’ agreement for a fast and final resolution of their dispute. For this reason, arbitrators, courts, and commentators are quick to emphasize the very limited scope of an application under Article 36 or its analogous provisions in other rules. Given the likelihood, however, of at least one party feeling aggrieved by the tribunal’s decision, Article 36 can also be subject to creative attempts to reargue a particular legal, evidential, or procedural point.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165137785 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Martin F Gusy, James M Hosking, G.I. Walters
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/law/9780197848012.003.0037
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780197848012.003.0037
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.