Assessing patient medication education materials across drug databases: A content and readability study

Clicks: 4
ID: 317881
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #102 of 151 articles by views in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 151 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the completeness and readability of patient education materials available through 3 widely used drug information databases and assess their potential impact on patient comprehension. Methods A cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient education materials for 50 commonly prescribed medications was conducted across 3 different drug information databases. Medications were selected from diverse therapeutic classes, such as cardiovascular, endocrine, mental health, and others. Completeness was evaluated using the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines, including indications, dosing, administration, adverse effects, drug interactions, and precautions. Readability was analyzed using validated tools, such as the Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid scale. Subgroup analysis examined variation by therapeutic class. Results All 3 databases were assigned high completeness scores, with drug interactions, lifestyle, and diet being the most common missing components. Readability scores varied significantly across databases. Database 1 produced materials closest to the National Institutes of Health/American Medical Association–recommended 6th-grade reading level, whereas databases 2 and 3 had higher literacy demands, producing materials from the 7th-grade to college level. It was also observed that education materials include numerous specific drug names. For instance, database 2 and database 3 often provided comprehensive medication lists for potential drug interactions, which increased readability scores and grade levels. When these lists were removed, the readability scores and grade levels decreased. Conclusion While most essential information was included in the patient education materials, readability remained a barrier to patient comprehension. Balancing clarity with completeness is essential for supporting adherence and safety.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165386086 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kaylee Whytal, Ciera Isaman, Lindsey Meeks, Darian Phidd, Thakul Rattansuwan
Journal American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ajhp/zxag183
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxag183
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.