Applying the Law of Neutrality in an Indo-Pacific Armed Conflict

Clicks: 4
ID: 317874
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,465 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Although the law of neutrality has undergone change since the First World War, it remains a relevant and essential element of the law of armed conflict. The law imposes duties and confers rights on neutral and belligerent States to prevent the escalation of the conflict and minimize its effects on neutral States. This includes neutral commerce, which will be critical in any armed conflict in the Indo-Pacific, as regional States rely heavily on the free flow of commerce for their economic security. Closure of the Indo-Pacific sea lines of communication by a belligerent would significantly affect regional and global economic stability. The traditional law of neutrality requires neutrals to observe strict impartiality between the parties to the conflict and abstain from providing war-related goods or other military assistance to the belligerents. Some States take the position that neutrals may discriminate in favor of States that are victims of aggression. Under the concept of qualified neutrality, States are not bound by the traditional obligations of strict impartiality and abstention and may supply war-related material to a victim of aggression without violating the law of neutrality. Belligerent warships may conduct visit and search of merchant ships outside neutral waters to determine the ship’s true character (enemy or neutral), the manner of its employment (innocent or hostile), and the nature of its cargo (contraband or free goods). Neutral merchant vessels must submit to visit and search, and if they actively resist, they may be considered a military objective and attacked.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165203272 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197844540.003.0004
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.