Large-Scale Combat Operations in the Indo-Pacific—Practical Implications for International Law

Clicks: 4
ID: 317870
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #404 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter concerns the interplay between law and strategy when confronting the prospect of Great Power war in the Indo-Pacific. Specifically, it addresses how international law contributes to or detracts from deterrence and escalation control, as well as the strategic factors that risk the erosion of respect for the law of armed conflict (LOAC). After exploring the fundamental precepts that underpin deterrence by denial, the chapter highlights how firm signals about collective self-defense and qualified neutrality make conventional deterrence more effective. It then addresses weapons law and the probability that renunciations of ugly but effective weapons such as anti-personnel land mines and cluster munitions will come to be seen as an unaffordable luxury item in an era of Great Power competition. Turning to the topic of escalation control, the chapter explores the strain that factors such as the expected high costs of a war over Taiwan and the possibility of protraction will place on respect for LOAC. It argues that a highly costly war, or one that extends over a long period, will increase enmity between the parties to the conflict and increase the likelihood of grave breaches and other violations. Finally, the chapter asks whether the strategic and legal ambiguity over the status of Taiwan in international law may complicate both the perceived legitimacy of collective self-defense and the political calculus statesmen on both sides must engage in to preserve a viable path to war termination.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165202472 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors J. J. Merriam
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197844540.003.0002
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197844540.003.0002
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.