Article 29—Default

Clicks: 1
ID: 317852
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,305 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This chapter focuses on Article 29 of the ICDR Rules. Article 29 addresses the situation in which one party to a proceeding ‘defaults’, whether by failing to file a timely Answer, appear at a hearing, produce evidence, or otherwise contravene an order of the tribunal. Unsurprisingly, such a default occurs only where the errant party has been duly notified of the steps required and, in some cases, where the party fails to show sufficient cause to excuse its failure. In such circumstances, the tribunal may choose to proceed with the arbitration regardless of such failure. In contrast to litigation in many jurisdictions, this approach is preferred to issuing any sort of ‘summary judgment’ or ‘default judgment’. In other words, the claimant must still make out his or her case and the arbitrators must still review the legal and evidential record before making a final determination.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165133457 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Martin F Gusy, James M Hosking, G.I. Walters
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/law/9780197848012.003.0030
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780197848012.003.0030
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.