RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Clicks: 223
ID: 31772
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
72.2
/100
223 views
180 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #70 of 225 articles by views in BMJ
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 225 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
sterne2019robbmj
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sterne, Jonathan A C;Savović, Jelena;Page, Matthew J;Elbers, Roy G;Blencowe, Natalie S;Boutron, Isabelle;Cates, Christopher J;Cheng, Hung-Yuan;Corbett, Mark S;Eldridge, Sandra M;Emberson, Jonathan R;Hernán, Miguel A;Hopewell, Sally;Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn;Junqueira, Daniela R;Jüni, Peter;Kirkham, Jamie J;Lasserson, Toby;Li, Tianjing;McAleenan, Alexandra;Reeves, Barnaby C;Shepperd, Sasha;Shrier, Ian;Stewart, Lesley A;Tilling, Kate;White, Ian R;Whiting, Penny F;Higgins, Julian P T; |
| Journal | BMJ |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1136/bmj.l4898
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.