Constraining the neutral hydrogen fraction during reionization: Cross-simulation inference using power spectrum and bispectrum

Clicks: 1
ID: 317637
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #712 of 900 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 900 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The redshifted 21-cm signal is a unique probe of the early universe, particularly the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). While the 21-cm power spectrum has been the primary statistic for parameter inference, it fails to capture the non-Gaussian information in the signal, motivating the use of higher-order statistics such as the bispectrum. We perform a rigorous cross-simulation validation to infer the mean neutral hydrogen fraction ($\bar{x}_{\rm H\, {\small I}}$) by training a neural network on 21cmFAST simulations and applying it to mock observations generated by the ReionYuga code. We first benchmark the framework in an idealized 21cmFAST-only setting before applying it to the more rigorous ReionYuga–21cmFAST cross-simulation case. Our analysis spans six redshifts and includes realistic SKA system noise and cosmic variance, calculated from 50 statistically independent realizations. In the same-code case, the bispectrum yields substantially tighter constraints, whereas in the cross-simulation case the improvement is moderate, with constraints tightened by ~1.4 × relative to the power spectrum-only case. The cross-simulation analysis also identifies a persistent systematic discrepancy between inferred and true values that often exceeds the statistical uncertainties, implying that modeling uncertainty remains the dominant limitation. Our results, therefore, indicate that the highly stringent constraints obtained in same-code validation studies may be overly optimistic, and mitigating cross-model systematics is crucial for robust parameter inference in the SKA era.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165014646 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anoop Krishna, Deepthi Moorkanat, Hiten, Rajesh Mondal
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1152
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag1152
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.