Role of Interatrial Connection Ablation in Reentry Dynamics: an in silico Evaluation

Clicks: 4
ID: 317350
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #86 of 103 articles by views in EP Europace

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Interatrial connections (IACs) may act as pathways sustaining atrial fibrillation, yet their role as ablation targets remains uncertain due to challenges in identifying IAC-dependent reentrant circuits. This study tracks reentrant activity along IACs, characterizes IAC-dependent reentries, and assesses the impact of in silico IAC ablation on reentry maintenance. METHODS: Six patient-specific biatrial bilayer models were reconstructed from CT and MRI-derived geometries, each incorporating four IACs: Bachmann's bundle, fossa ovalis, upper posterior, and coronary sinus. The Courtemanche ionic model was used to simulate mild (M) and severe (S) AF-related electrical remodeling, with fibrosis burden ranging from 9.0% (M) to 27.6% (S). Across the 12 models, 110 sustained reentries were induced, followed by circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Fifteen IAC ablation strategies were tested at three different timings. Critical pathways along the six possible interatrial loops were quantified. Tachycardia cycle length (TCL) and phase singularity (PS) clusters were analyzed before and after IAC ablation. RESULTS: Overall, 11.8% of reentries were IAC-dependent. Larger interatrial loops were the major contributors to critical pathway formation. IAC-dependent reentries exhibited more critical pathways, shorter TCL (194.2 vs 201.9 ms; ΔTCL=7.65 ms, p = 0.006), and more PS clusters in the RA body (8 [5-10] vs. 4 [2-6], p = 0.006). Ablation timing did not influence termination rates. CONCLUSION: We present the first framework to track reentrant activity along IACs. We identified IAC-dependent reentry characteristics that may guide patient stratification and targeted ablation strategies in clinical practice.
Reference Key
openalex_W7164853604 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Patricia Martínez Díaz, Hamed Hosseini, Vladimír Sobota, Carmen Martínez Antón, Carlos Edgar Lopez Barrera, Robin Van Den Abeele, Nele Vandersickel, Caroline H. Roney, Thomas Pambrun, Mélèze Hocini, Jason D. Bayer, Edward J. Vigmond
Journal EP Europace
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/europace/euag145
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.