Multi-sampling allows intra-tumoral heterogeneity querying and vulnerability profiling in glioblastoma

Clicks: 1
ID: 317301
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #117 of 125 articles by views in journal of neuro-oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 125 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a devastating cancer with limited treatment options, largely due to its heterogeneity. While supramaximal resection has recently provided survival benefits, therapeutic profiling of different tumor compartments, particularly its infiltrative edge remains largely unexplored. Methods Here, we leveraged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided multi-sampling, collecting 2 cores and 2 margins per case, to query GBM heterogeneity. Whole-exome and RNA-seq with drug testing in two patient-derived 3D models were used to reveal similarities and differences in genomic and transcriptomic makeups, cellular compositions, and drug responses across cores and margins. Bioinformatics interrogations further identified response biomarkers. Results Mutation analysis showed that oncogenes exhibited a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity than tumor suppressor genes, regardless of MRI status. While the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype with extracellular matrix remodeling, stress response, and immune programs were preferentially enriched in enhancing cores, proneural tumors with neurological processes favored non-enhancing margins. Using a 15-drug GBM-targeted panel, ERK (ulixertinib) and PI3K pathway (paxalisib, CC-115) inhibitors showed preferential efficacy in enhancing cores and non-enhancing margins, respectively. The anti-apoptosis, pan-Bcl2 agent navitoclax and the epigenetic drug trotabresib represented the most effective, tumor-wide monotherapies. Importantly, drug combinations generally outperformed single agents across all regions. Conclusions This work demonstrates the regional heterogeneity of therapeutic vulnerabilities in GBM ex vivo, showing various drugs with tumor-wide or MRI-enhancement informed activity. These findings offer preclinical bases of numerous monotherapies and drug combinations for future clinical trial design.
Reference Key
openalex_W7164826971 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors David M. Garcia, Wan‐Hsin Lin, Daniel P. Wickland, Erik Jessen, Erik H. Middlebrooks, Lauren E. Haydu, Mieu Brooks, Ryan W. Feathers, Lindsey Kinsella, Chris Sereduk, Steven S. Rosenfeld, Nhan L. Tran, Kaisorn L. Chaichana, Panos Z. Anastasiadis, Alfredo Quiñones‐Hinojosa
Journal journal of neuro-oncology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noag139
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.