Oral Wash PCR Improves the Diagnosis of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients Without HIV: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Clicks: 1
ID: 317086
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #527 of 532 articles by views in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 532 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is increasingly common in HIV-negative immunocompromised patients, who generally have low fungal burdens. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be poorly tolerated in fragile patients, and oropharyngeal wash (OW) could be an interesting alternative, but its effectiveness remains underexplored in these patients. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted to assess PCR on OW in HIV-negative patients undergoing BAL to document respiratory symptoms. Beta-1-3-D-glucan (BDG) was also measured on blood samples. Patients were classified by a multidisciplinary committee as having definite PCP, colonization, possible PCP or without Pneumocystis. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and ROC analysis were determined for each test. Agreement between BAL PCR, OW PCR and BDG was assessed. RESULTS: Statistical analyses were performed on 369 patients: 76 with PCP, 55 colonized, 214 without Pneumocystis, and 24 possible PCP. PCR in OW was positive in 81.6%, 30.9%, 0%, and 45.8% of patients with PCP, colonization, no PCP, and possible PCP, respectively. Mean fungal loads in OW were 4251±15501 and 3±8.5 copies/mL in PCP and colonized patients, respectively (p<0.0001). PPV and NPV of OW PCR were 78.5% and 73.1%, respectively. ROC analysis identified a threshold of 7 copies/mL for OW to achieve a PPV of 90%, with a sensitivity of 73.5%. Agreement between OW PCR and BDG was poor (κ<0.4), but the combination of BDG+/OW PCR+ yielded a PPV of 92%. CONCLUSIONS: PCR on OW is a useful non-invasive tool for diagnosing PCP in HIV-negative patients.
Reference Key
openalex_W7164326605 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Florence Robert-Gangneux, Gilles Nevez, Céline Damiani, Y. Le Guen, Christophe Gut‐Gobert, Amélie Bazire, Anne Totet, V. Jounieaux, R Le Berre, Fanny Thépault, Pierre Tattevin, Aude Barnier, S. Jouneau, Florian Reizine, M. Kerjouan, Pierre Chauvin, Chloé Rousseau, Ronan Garlantézec, Jean‐Pierre Gangneux, Christophe Camus, Solène Le Gal
Journal Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/cid/ciag356
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag356
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.