Diversity, equity and inclusion in arrhythmia care: A European Heart Rhythm Association survey
Clicks: 1
ID: 317034
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #58 of 79 articles by views in EP Europace
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Disparities in arrhythmia care are increasingly recognised, yet remain incompletely characterised across the patient pathway. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey explored clinician-reported perceptions of inequity across diagnosis, pharmacological management, procedural referral and follow-up. Methods A 30-question survey was disseminated via the EHRA between November 2025 and January 2026, with 212 responses from professionals across 35 countries. Results Respondents were predominantly consultant electrophysiologists (67.5%), with 39.6% identifying as female. Most (68.4%) reported no prior training in equity or inclusive care. Across the arrhythmia care pathway, disparities were most frequently attributed to patient vulnerability, particularly cognitive impairment (72.5%), age >80 years (63.8%) and mental health disease (61.3%). Differences related to socioeconomic status, language and other social factors were also commonly reported. Female sex and minority ethnic background were each reported to influence care in 24.1% of responses. Age >80 years was consistently identified as the strongest determinant of disparities in referral, diagnosis and outcomes, influencing referral for arrhythmia evaluation (65.8%), catheter ablation (77.9%) and outcomes following ablation (68.1%). Socioeconomic and ethnic factors showed more modest but consistent effects, while sex-based differences were less frequently reported. However, female respondents were more likely than male respondents to report delayed referral (female respondents: 41.8%; male respondents: 19.8%) and late or incorrect diagnosis (49.4% vs 15.8%) in female patients, as well as delayed referral for catheter ablation (36.5% vs 10.3%) and device implantation (23.0% vs 7.0%). Only one-third of respondents (33.3%) felt that current international guidelines adequately address diversity, equity and inclusion in arrhythmia care. Conclusions Clinicians perceive disparities in arrhythmia care across multiple patient and social factors. Whilst age and vulnerability were most frequently perceived to influence care, sex and ethnicity were also recognised by a substantial proportion of respondents. Perceptions varied according to respondent characteristics, with female clinicians more likely to report disparities amongst female patients. Limited training and institutional frameworks highlight opportunities for targeted interventions.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164388213
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark T Mills, Maura M. Zylla, Gábor Zoltán Duray, Jarkko Karvonen, Melanie Gunawardene, Christian‐Hendrik Heeger, Katarzyna Małaczyńska-Rajpold, M Mazurek, Martina Nesti, Diego Penela, Laura Perrotta, Martin H. Ruwald, Douglas S. Scherr, Matteo Anselmino, K. R. Julian Chun |
| Journal | EP Europace |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/europace/euag144
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.