The EU Nature Restoration Regulation as an opportunity for kelp forest conservation and restoration in Europe
Clicks: 1
ID: 316864
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #187 of 195 articles by views in Annals of botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Kelp forests are among the most productive and biodiverse ecosystems on Earth, yet they are currently facing unprecedented degradation and decline. In Europe, the conservation of these key ecosystems has historically relied on a plethora of disconnected national policies and passive protection, and they have frequently been underrepresented in governance frameworks. The recent adoption of the European Union Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR) represents a transformative shift, establishing the first legally binding targets for large-scale conservation and restoration of marine ecosystems shared by European Union members. Scope Here, we discuss the challenges and opportunities that the NRR presents for European kelp forests and associated ecosystem services across Europe. As the NRR sets ambitious mandates for mapping habitats, condition assessments, and restoration by 2030–2050, its success depends on overcoming existing data gaps as well as on financial and technical challenges. We highlight how the NRR provides a valuable instrument to initiate immediate action across regions, and we propose a set of priority actions to achieve the NRR targets and address current scientific gaps. Conclusions We emphasize the need for transboundary harmonization of monitoring protocols and methods for establishing reference areas for healthy kelp forests, the development of high-resolution maps for habitat distribution and condition, the establishment of clear-cut criteria for identifying resilient restoration areas (i.e., priority sites capable of achieving and maintaining favourable conservation status under NRR targets), and the development of standardized condition indicators (e.g., canopy density, indicator species) to assess “good condition” across different ecoregions. By linking legal requirements with science-based strategies, the NRR provides an opportunity to finally integrate kelp forests into European marine governance and achieve long-term sustainability for these critical ecosystems.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164179042
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina Piñeiro‐Corbeira, Nerea Alvite, F Arenas, Sara Barrientos, Kai Bischof, Thomas Burel, Thibaut de Bettignies, Olivier De Clerck, Sandrine Derrien-Courtel, Hannah S. Earp, Karen Filbee‐Dexter, João N. Franco, Lars Gamfeldt, Lilja Gunnarsdóttir, Peter Haugan, Jean‐Charles Leclerc, Kjell Magnus Norderhaug, Maggie M. Reddy, Peter A U Staehr, Kristoffer Stedt, Gunilla Toth, Jan Verbeek, Sofie Vranken, Rodolfo Barreiro, Thomas Wernberg |
| Journal | Annals of botany |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/aob/mcag166
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.