Assessment of a novel semi-automated dataset for large scale surveillance of Central venous catheter–related mechanical complications
Clicks: 1
ID: 316106
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #103 of 106 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether a novel semi-automated dataset based on electronic health record documentation can be used for surveillance of central venous catheter-related mechanical complications (failed catheterisation, bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia, pneumothorax and nerve injury) within 24 hours of catheterisation. METHODS: The semi-automated dataset comprised a fully automated extraction of clinical documentation from the electronic health record supplemented with a minor manual review aimed at identifying pneumothoraces as these rarely are diagnosed at the time of insertion but rather after a postprocedural chest X-ray. To assess surveillance performance, we compared the number of mechanical complications between the semi-automated and manually evaluated datasets for the same cohort and study period, focusing on agreement in aggregate counts. Comparisons were made at the group level only, without enforcing insertion-by-insertion matching. RESULTS: A total of 12 667 insertions were included. Minor mechanical complications occurred in 615 (4.9%) of the insertions in the semi-automated dataset and in 645 (5.1%) of the insertions in the manually validated dataset. Major mechanical complications occurred in 44 (0.35%) of the insertions in the semi-automated dataset compared to 48 (0.38%) in the manually validated dataset. CONCLUSION: A semi-automated dataset based on electronic health record documentation provides sufficiently accurate surveillance of central catheterisation related mechanical complications at the group level. Despite minor discrepancies, the semi-automated method enhances efficiency, scalability, and supports continuous real-time quality assurance. The potential underestimation of complication rates is offset by the possibility of robust real-time quality assurance in registries and a substantial analytical power in scientific studies.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163739320
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Emilia Ängeby, Maria Adrian, Mathias Lazarevic Lindblad, Ola Borgquist, Thomas Kander |
| Journal | International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/intqhc/mzag080
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.