How to Prove Wisdom Exists

Clicks: 1
ID: 315976
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #37 of 48 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this paper is to argue that practical wisdom, like any other genuine system in the world, does exist. According to practical wisdom eliminativism, there is no such thing as practical wisdom, or, as Christian Miller has put it, on metaphysical grounds, practical wisdom does not exist. This paper develops an argument, termed the System Argument, which specifies the conditions under which practical wisdom exists and establishes its existence. It further contrasts the System Response, represented by the System Argument, with the Analogy Response, which seeks to demonstrate the existence of practical wisdom through analogies such as the decathlon and enology. This comparison demonstrates the greater explanatory power of the System Argument.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163649545 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cheng‐Hung Tsai
Journal journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/analys/anag038
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anag038
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.