The outcomes of Lean management in a large academic hospital in Finland in 2018–2023: a qualitative study

Clicks: 1
ID: 315889
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #97 of 106 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Lean management (LM) has been implemented in healthcare organisations, promising efficient operations, rapid patient access to care, improved staff satisfaction and lower costs. However, use of LM is questioned because there is no strong evidence of its outcomes, so proof of long-term and organisation-wide use is needed. The aim of the study is to increase understanding of the long-term effects of LM in healthcare. Methods This is a case study done at the Helsinki University Hospital in Finland. A retrospective qualitative study was conducted in three sectors (A, B and C) of the hospital. Fourteen healthcare leaders from three sectors participated in interviews by answering structured and open-ended questions. The interviews were used to evaluate the outcomes that are experienced by the leaders in the hospital setting over a five-year period and evaluate indicators that they used to assess these outcomes. The interviews were analysed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis with ATLAS.ti analysis software (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Results The outcomes of LM can be grouped into three main categories (organisation, patient and staff) that are divided into six subcategories: experiential, care-related, work-related, economic, leadership and management, and image effects. The leaders experienced the greatest benefits on the organisation level, as it enhanced the effectiveness of the organisation’s structure and operations, fostered continuous development, improved staff retention and attraction and promoted patient-centredness. According to the leaders, the most important benefits for patients included improved access to care, better care flow, enhanced safety of care and greater participation in improving operations. In addition, the leaders highlighted that the biggest benefits for staff, were increased work satisfaction, work competence, work commitment and ethical behaviour. We found that the use of LM also has disruptive and contradictory effects caused by the lack of organisation-wide Lean commitment and structure, and the media have bias towards negative portrayals of hospital efficiency. Conclusion We found that six subcategories provide a comprehensive framework for qualitatively assessing organisation-wide experienced outcomes of LM in the hospital. Our findings emphasise that the organisation should be fully committed to the Lean method, and its structure should be clear so that the best benefits of LM can be achieved. We noticed that more qualitative LM research is needed to complement the Lean knowledge gained from quantitative research, develop more comprehensive and high-quality evaluation indicators and increase evidence for its use in healthcare.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163511024 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Irmeli Hirvelä, Elina Reponen, Mervi Javanainen, Riikka Lämsä, Vesa Niskanen, Paulus Torkki
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzag079
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag079
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.