Failure to Rescue in Surgery: When Systems Fail and Surgeons’ Traits Matter – A Qualitative Study

Clicks: 1
ID: 315713
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #403 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Complications are inherent to surgery and can unfortunately lead to loss of patients. Death following a potentially manageable complication is referred to as failure to rescue (FTR) and is used as a surgical quality metric. But beyond its metric function, FTR is a traumatic event for patients, families and surgical teams. Despite its high stakes and emotional weight, FTR is rarely discussed, limiting opportunities for learning, support, and curriculum development. Aims To explore how surgeons make sense of FTR and derive implications for surgical education and culture. Methods Using a constructivist grounded theory approach and convenience sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with practicing or recently retired surgeons with a minimum of 5 years of experience in their senior years. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and iteratively coded using software-assisted analysis, constant comparison, and progressive categorization; recruitment continued until thematic sufficiency. Results Fourteen surgeons were interviewed, including 12 men (86%) and 2 women (14%), aged 34 to 68 years. Specialties included abdominal surgery (64%), orthopedics/traumatology (29%), and vascular surgery (7%). Five themes were developed: (1) Trapped in a flawed system: Surgeons perceived FTR as inevitable within systemic and institutional constraints; (2) Hierarchical barriers continue to predominate, hindering adequate reaction and shared decision-making; (3) Imperfect heroes: Surgeons saw themselves as passionate, resilient, and driven, yet vulnerable to narcissism, horizontal violence, and performative behaviors; (4) Coping with failure: FTR events were painful yet contributed to improved clinical expertise; and (5) Strategies and Tools for Rescue, characterized by sharing personal strategies and proposing system-level improvements. Conclusion FTR emerged as a profound “surgeon experience” that shapes individual emotional well-being and professional development. Traits valued in surgery were described as potentially delaying escalation and help-seeking approaches. Educational and cultural efforts that foster humility, reduce hierarchical barriers, and strengthen peer support may shift FTR from a tragedy toward collective learning.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163318978 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors H L Gros, V Werdecker, K Gunatharan, I Gockel, B P Müller-Stich, J M Klasen
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag055.021
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag055.021
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.