Irregular theories
Clicks: 1
ID: 315266
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #45 of 48 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In logic, a theory is a deductively closed set of sentences. Theories containing all logical theorems are called regular, while irregular theories omit at least one logical theorem. We argue that the widespread assumption that theories must be regular is misguided. This is because (1) philosophical sense can be made of irregular theories when thinking of theories as modeling trasmission of commitment and (2) standard reasons for only considering regular theories are either question-begging or unnecessarily limit what theories can be used for.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162769886
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Franci Mangraviti, Andrew Tedder |
| Journal | journal of pharmaceutical analysis |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/analys/anag036
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.