Binary labels, binary stories: Sex and the white-throated sparrow
Clicks: 2
ID: 315213
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #89 of 115 articles by views in integrative and comparative biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Debates about whether sex is binary often conflate gamete size, which is unambiguously binary, with the development of sex-related traits, which is not. Most sex-related behaviors, morphologies, and physiological processes arise from developmental pathways that generate overlapping, multidimensional variation. Here, I summarize two decades of research on a species that has been said to “break” the sex binary: the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis), This species exhibits a chromosomal polymorphism linked to alternative behavioral strategies that cut across gonadal sex. Birds of the white-striped and tan-striped morphs differ in territorial aggression and parental provisioning, behaviors that form opposing components of a life-history trade-off. These phenotypes are associated with differential expression of the genes ESR1 and VIP, which are located within a chromosomal rearrangement. Variation in expression of these genes predicts behavioral variation independently of sex and morph, and the same genes contribute to both aggression and parenting through brain region-specific regulation. These findings demonstrate that traits often treated as sex-related can be reorganized along dimensions that cross sex categories. More importantly, they illustrate that physiological variables such as gene expression, hormonal signaling, and neural circuit function can better explain variation than categorical labels alone. Focusing on mechanisms rather than categories allows a better understanding of how phenotypes arise and avoids attributing causal power to binary groupings that obscure biologically meaningful variation.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162763098
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Donna L. Maney |
| Journal | integrative and comparative biology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/icb/icag057
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.