Differentiation for drought strategy but conserved plasticity to heat and drought in locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana

Clicks: 1
ID: 315071
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #113 of 195 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adaptive plasticity may be crucial for plants to survive rapid environmental changes long enough for evolutionary adaptation to occur. Heat and drought are both abiotic stresses projected to increase globally and their individual impact on plant growth and function is well-characterized. Drought response, in particular, is categorized into three drought survival strategies: escape, avoidance, and tolerance. However, to understand potential responses to climate change, we must manipulate multiple stressors simultaneously. We do not know what role plasticity to the combination of heat and drought plays in drought strategy or how plasticity will affect adaptation to projected future climates. METHODS: We measured heat- and drought-related traits as well as fitness in two locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana from Rödåsen, Sweden and Castelnuovo di Porto, Italy. We used chamber common gardens that simulate the current fall and spring climate in Sweden and a hotter and drier climate to identify population differentiation for trait means, trait plasticity, and fitness. KEY RESULTS: Population differentiation in both treatments suggests that the Swedish population avoids drought by investing in stress-tolerant leaves while the Italian population escapes drought by flowering early. Despite these differences, there is little evidence for genetic differentiation of plasticity; when experiencing heat and drought, both populations shift their traits in the direction expected to avoid drought. Further, both populations have greatly decreased fitness in heat and drought. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight that locally adapted populations with genetic differentiation for traits within a single environment can respond to the same stressors with plasticity in the same direction. Further, the combination of increased heat and drought will be extremely damaging to plant populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7162503282 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sophia F. Buysse, Victoria A Nicholes, Jeffrey K. Conner, Emily B. Josephs
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag153
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.