Robotic-assisted pediatric lung anatomical resection: A Safe alternative to thoracotomy in children’s complex cases
Clicks: 16
ID: 314931
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
4.5
/100
16 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #20 of 42 articles by views in european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Thoracoscopy is the gold standard for paediatric lung surgery. However, in patients with prior infections or inflammatory lung disease, conversion rate to open surgery remains high. Optimized technical skills with Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) may offer technical advantages in complex cases. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study assessed safety and outcomes of RATS for anatomical lung resection in paediatric patients. we retrospectively collected data from all the French university hospital using robotic platform for lung surgery between 2016 and 2024. The procedures were conducted in collaboration with robotic adult thoracic surgeons. RESULTS: During the study period 687 lung resections were performed in the 3 participating centers. Among them, 30 underwent RATS lung resection, with a median age of 10 years [8.3-13.0], a median weight of 32.5 kilograms (Kg) [27.3-48.8]. No intraoperative complications or conversions to thoracotomy occurred. The overall postoperative complication rate was 33%, mostly minor air leaks and pleural effusions that resolved spontaneously. Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 10% of cases. Median hospital stay was 5 days. Despite a predominance of chronic inflammatory lung disease and previous infections (conditions typically associated with higher morbidity) the robotic approach maintained acceptable outcomes. Within those patients, three bronchial sleeves were successfully performed. CONCLUSIONS: RATS appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to thoracotomy for paediatric lung resection especially for complex cases. Its enhanced dexterity and three-dimensional visualization facilitate complex dissections and suturing, particularly in inflammatory conditions. The rarity of indications and the limited operative workspace in this population remain challenges, encouraging collaboration with high volume adult robotic thoracic surgeons.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162285935
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Margaux Langeron, Marion Durand, Jessical Pinol, Sabine Sarnacki, Thomas Blanc, Frédéric Hameury, Nicoleta Panait, Naziha Khen‐Dunlop |
| Journal | european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ejcts/ezag176
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.