Clarifying the scope and capabilities of ROTS in differential expression analysis
Clicks: 1
ID: 314930
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #768 of 829 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 829 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
SUMMARY: Recently, Anwar et al. introduced a method combining the ROTS reproducibility optimisation procedure with empirical Bayes variance estimation from limma. Here, we clarify several methodological aspects to support accurate interpretation of the results. We emphasise that ROTS is a general reproducibility optimisation framework rather than a single statistical test and demonstrate that benchmarking outcomes in the reported spike-in case studies are highly sensitive to analysis and evaluation choices. Furthermore, our reanalyses of the spike-in datasets do not support the reported conclusions, and we were unable to reproduce the results of the clinical Alzheimer's disease case study. These findings highlight the importance of transparent benchmarking practices and careful interpretation of comparative results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The ROTS package is available through Bioconductor. The reanalyses were performed using the original code, with the minimal additions described in the manuscript.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162288174
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tomi Suomi, Jalmari Kettunen, Taneli Pusa, Laura L. Elo |
| Journal | BMC Bioinformatics |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bioinformatics/btag335
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.