Uric Acid to HDL-C Ratio as a Novel Biomarker for Sarcopenia: A National Study with Machine Learning Insights
Clicks: 1
ID: 314734
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #103 of 129 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Sarcopenia is a major age-related health burden. Although the uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) has been linked to sarcopenia, the underlying pathways and its clinical utility for risk stratification remain unclear. Methods We analyzed 9,853 middle-aged and older adults from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Sarcopenia was defined by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 Consensus (AWGS 2019) criteria. We assessed the UHR-sarcopenia relationship using multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines. Mediation analyses examined roles of insulin resistance (TyG index) and renal function (eGFR). Five machine learning algorithms—logistic regression, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)—were developed. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Within the training set, 5-fold cross-validation was applied for hyperparameter tuning. Model performance in the test set was primarily evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature selection was conducted using Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) methods, and model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results In this nationally representative cohort, higher UHR was independently associated with lower odds of sarcopenia (adjusted odds ratio (OR) per- standard deviation (SD) increase = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69–0.81, P < 0.001), showing a nonlinear dose-response. UHR correlated with better handgrip strength and chair-stand performance. The TyG index and eGFR mediated 16.44% and 2.03% of this association, respectively. In machine learning analyses, model performance was broadly comparable across algorithms. In the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) ranged from 0.73 to 0.77. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost demonstrated the best performance (ROC-AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.70, sensitivity = 0.70, specificity = 0.71). SHAP analysis based on the XGBoost model further identified UHR as the second most important predictor of sarcopenia, following age. Conclusions Our study provides robust evidence that a higher UHR is a protective factor against sarcopenia in Chinese middle‑aged and older adults, partially mediated by metabolic and renal pathways. UHR demonstrates strong discriminatory value in risk profiling, supporting its potential as a simple, integrative biomarker for sarcopenia screening in this population.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162079942
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruonan Yang, Zesong Cheng, Pei Yang, Xiujuan Yang, Wanlin Liao, Siwei Zhai |
| Journal | the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/gerona/glag132
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.