Patients With Traumatic Injury Transported By Critical Care Air Transport Teams: The Influence of Altitude and Oxygenation During Transport

Clicks: 4
ID: 314597
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #53 of 72 articles by views in Military Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction During previous military conflicts, the U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) transported critical patients out of theater to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) with cabin pressures equivalent to an altitude of 5,000 to 8,000 feet. In order to avoid risks associated with hypobaria, in-theater medical providers are tasked with determining if cabin altitude restrictions (CAR) to 4,000-6,000 feet should be prescribed for individual patients. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare CCATT trauma patients transported with CAR and without CAR to evaluate the impact of CAR on clinical outcomes for trauma populations other than TBI. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare patients with traumatic injury who were prescribed and flew with CAR to those who did not fly with CAR (nonCAR). Patients with moderate to severe injury severity scores (ISSs > 12) transported between January 2007 and December 2020 were included. We analyzed data for 837 patients evacuated by CCATT to a Role 4 treatment facility with non-TBI traumatic injuries. We classified patients into the CAR and nonCAR groups based on the CAR prescription (a yes/no checkbox) and the maximum cabin altitude (<5,000 feet indicated a CAR) listed on their CCATT record. Results One hundred fourteen patients (14%) were included in the CAR group and 723 (86%) were in the nonCAR group. Patients in the CAR group were more likely to have a penetrating injury than the nonCAR group (32.5% vs. 23.4%, P = .0364). The CAR group had higher rates of chest tube management than the nonCAR group (43.9% vs. 26.1%, P < .0001). There were no other significant differences in rates of in-flight interventions or in medications administered. In the nonCAR group, we observed an increase in the proportion of patients with hypoxemia (10.0% pre-flight to 18.1% in-flight, P < .0001). The overall mortality rate was 2.4% (n = 18 patients). The median time spent on a ventilator was 5 days (IQR 3-8 days), time in the ICU was 8 days (IQR 6-14 days), and hospital length of stay was 25 days (IQR 7-48 days). The CAR and nonCAR groups did not significantly differ in any of these outcome measures. Subgroup analyses revealed that in the nonCAR group, patients with in-flight hypoxemia spent more time on the ventilator (median 6 days [IQR 3-11 days] vs. 5 days [IQR 2-8 days], P = .0011) and in the ICU (median 11 days [IQR 7-20 days] vs. 8 days [IQR 6-12 days], P = .0004) than those without in-flight hypoxemia. There were no differences in any outcome measures for the CAR group. Conclusions Hypoxemia occurred more frequently in CCAT patients flown without cabin altitude restrictions but no overall differences in patient outcomes were observed. The prescription of CAR may serve as a mediator in the presence of hypoxemia, therefore in theater medical providers should consider the potential benefits of CAR in select patients.
Reference Key
openalex_W7161971376 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Shelia C. Savell, Allyson A. Araña, Jill Lear, Darren Baldwin, Julie Cutright, William T Davis, Ryan E. Earnest, Patrick Ng
Journal Military Medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usag182
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usag182
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.